The following message is being distributed by a group that is aligned with Parker Development, “Alliance for Responsible Planning” and being headed by the Board of Supervisor’s appointed Chairperson of the Community and Economic Development Advisory Commission,
(Save Our County’s comments in red)
Begin forwarded message:
From: EDCARP Update <email@example.com>
Date: January 7, 2016 at 1:20:55 PM PST
To: Site Admin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject:Alliance for Responsible Planning Luncheon — Friday, January 22, 2016; 11:30 AM to 1:00 PM
You are cordially invited to attend a complimentary luncheon
Friday, January 22, 2016
From 11:30 AM until 1:00 PM
In the Private Waterfall Buffet Room at Red Hawk Casino.
Much has happened since our last luncheon meeting, and new issues are on the horizon.
Following years of public hearings and environmental review, the Board of Supervisors approved the Targeted General Plan Amendment/Zoning Ordinance Update on December 15, 2015. The first comprehensive update of the zoning ordinance in over 30 years:
Brings zoning consistent with the General Plan for about 6% of parcels that were previously “inconsistent”;There are 94,000 parcels on the tax rolls 6% would be 5640 parcels so why did the county rezone 37,000 parcels?
Extends “right to farm” protections to some of our most productive agricultural lands;And possibly removed protections from around 2,300 previously Ag zoned parcels that the County “opted out” of Ag without much understanding of the consequence of that action.
Provides rural commerce opportunities to maintain economic viability of larger parcels in rural areas;Allowing for rural commerce was already in the existing General Plan, but the County went beyond this by allowing a home occupancy business to be retail or industrial without checking for compatibility with their neighbor.
Does not change General Plan Land Uses (“colors”) except a small number of map corrections.This is a conflicting statement. The county changed land use even after telling the public that there would be NO land use changes. The public argued that this massive General Plan overhaul would not be necessary if they just changed the land use to match the zoning. We were told by the County that they could not change land use.
As you might imagine, this does not conclude planning-related issues on the near-term horizon.
Litigation to challenge TGPA/ZOU is threatened by opposition groups;This is not a threat but is a duty of the public to hold our government officials responsible for upholding the law. The Board of Supervisors left the public no choice but to litigate – unfortunately they will be using our money to defend their actions.
Petitions to recall the entire Board of Supervisors are being circulated by a small group of activists frustrated by their inability to control County government;The Board of Supervisors are suppose to be public servants and answer to their citizens, that’s what we hired them to do! We did not yield our sovereignty to the agencies which serve us.
Efforts continue to obstruct our “Area of Origin” water rights application, including attempts to discredit the fiscally sound policies of the majority of the EID Board.
Is it a sound decision to gamble $11 million of tax and rate payer funds for speculation when they know that the jurisdictions down river will sue to stop them as they did before? The other issue to consider is do we really need water rights for 216,000* more residents on metered water and do we really want to fund the last $180 million* to implement the infrastructure for these future residents? (*these facts are hard to document given they come from those that don’t always share truth)
Two initiatives will appear on the June 2016 ballot. The “Yellow Petition” claims to “Reinstate Measure Y”, but even Bill Center has said this initiative goes “far beyond” original Measure Y, and would have “serious economic impacts”. The “Purple Petition” would make sweeping General Plan amendments to conform the Land Use Map to old zoning, among other changes.
“Reinstate Measure Y” goes back to forcing the developers to pay their own way for roads and as originally stated takes the vote away from the Board and back to the people before a road can be allowed to go to level of service F (gridlock).
The “Retain our current zoning and Rural assets” initiative requires the Board to implement the protection policies as promised in the 2004 General Plan before allowing developers to bulldoze the resources the plan was to protect.
The Board of Supervisors have enormous power over our land use, over the last 20 years they have severely abused that discretion and these initiatives put that power back in check allowing for common sense development and protection of our treasured resources for local use rather than incentivizing stack and pack development for favored developers at Taxpayers expense.
As you can see, there’s a lot to talk about, and we hope you will be able to join us for this timely discussion. Because seating is limited, please let us know in advance if you are unable to attend.
Anyone want to go and set the record straight for this propaganda event?
Thank you again for your valuable contribution to the future of our county.
Alliance for Responsible Planning, President
RSVP (Regrets Only) by reply to this email or to